The five-member bench of the Supreme Court dismissed all review pleas against the Panama case decision on Friday, after the petitioners' counsels wrapped up their arguments earlier.
The review petitions had been filed by the Sharif family and Finance Minister Ishaq Dar against the Supreme Court's judgment in the Panama Papers case.
Presenting his arguments earlier, Sharif children's counsel Salman Akram Raja said that Capt (retd) Safdar has nothing to do with the London flats [owned by the Sharif family].
Safdar is the son-in-law of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif and an elected lawmaker.
Read more: JIT documents show Nawaz did receive salary from Capital FZE: Supreme Court
The bench is headed by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa and comprises Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed and Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan — who along with the latter two headed the special implementation bench in the Panama case that oversaw the work of the Joint Investigation Team.
Raja was referring to the court's order in the Panama case directing inclusion of Safdar's name in the corruption reference against the Sharif family regarding their London properties.
In response, Justice Khosa remarked that Safdar definitely has some connection with the London flats.
Raja said he agrees with the arguments presented by Nawaz's counsel Khawaja Harris in the past two days regarding the appointment of a monitoring judge and the JIT's work.
In response to the bench’s observation that Safdar’s signatures are present on the trust deed for the flats, Raja said he signed the document as a witness.
“There should've been an inquiry, why did you order a [NAB] reference,” he added.
Safdar’s basic rights will be hurt if a reference is filed in the accountability court, Raja said further.
Justice Khosa observed that Maryam had disowned the London flats before but the JIT report revealed she’s the owner.
Also read: Five-member SC bench was to decide on Nawaz’s disqualification: Justice Azmat
Justice Ejaz also stated that the British Virgin Islands confirmed that Maryam is the owner and that it is incorrect that Safdar is aloof from the entire matter.
In response to Raja’s argument that the trial court may be affected by the court’s observations, Justice Azmat remarked that yesterday the bench assured that no observation of theirs will affect trial proceedings. “There will be no compromise on a fair trial,” he observed further.
Justice Ejaz observed that the trial court will decide the case on the basis of evidence.
“Let the matter be investigated,” observed Justice Khosa, saying further that the judges were very careful in writing the Panama Papers case judgment.
Raja then concluded his arguments following which Shiekh Rasheed’s petition regarding reopening of the Hudaibiya Paper Mills case was taken up.
Rasheed's petition was concluded after the NAB prosecutor general gave an assurance that the bureau will file the appeal in the Hudaibiya case within seven days.
Speaking to the media outside the court before the trial commenced, Rasheed said today is an "important day in Pakistan’s political history".
